Skip to main content

Netherland Sells OFF F-16 Fighter Jets To Chile


Netherlands F-16

Netherlands F-16


Five F-16 fighters from the Netherlands are on their way to Chile as the government continues to cut expenditures.

The planes, which departed Monday from Volkel Air Base, are part of a 2009 sales agreement between the two countries.


The Dutch Ministry of Defense said the first two batches of F-16s -- totaling 12 aircraft in all -- were delivered in November 2010 and in April of this year.


Six F-16s, manufactured by General Dynamics of the United States, were to have departed for Chile Monday, but one could not leave on time and will follow later this week.


The 18 fighter planes sold to Chile are one result of the defense policy measures decided in 2007 to free up additional money for defense in the form of proceeds from the sale of defense equipment.


In addition to aircraft, the Netherlands is also selling some of its artillery pieces and combat tanks.


With these sales, the number of combat aircraft in the Air Force's fleet decreased from 105 to 87 with 14 aircraft used for training.


In 2006, Chile had already purchased 18 F-16s following Dutch military cuts stemming from the government's 2003 Budget Letter.


The Defense Ministry said another 18 F-16s, which are to be retired under the latest round of defense cuts, will also be divested.


The Netherlands, like most West European nations, is struggling to maintain economic health in the face of the world economic crisis.


Former U.S. Defense Secretary Bob Gates, prior to his departure from the post earlier this year, chastised NATO member states for not investing enough in defense.


Few NATO members, he said, were meeting the alliance's requirement of spending 2 percent of gross domestic product on defense.


The result was that few members had the wherewithal to fully participate in NATO missions.


"In almost all European states, as in the United States, the defense budget is being used as a convenient quarry for saving money, exactly because the adverse effects of cutting defense are (hopefully) long-term and quite abstract--and therefore also hidden," the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank, wrote in a later report. "As a consequence, many European states are on the verge of losing even basic defense capabilities, despite painful reform efforts to make their militaries more efficient.


"Unfortunately, this is happening at a time in global politics when the traditional guarantor of European security, the United States, is struggling with its own budget crisis and problems of military overstretch, and it is therefore urging Europeans to take on a greater share of the burden of their own defense."


According to the Stockholm Peace International Peace Research Institute, the Netherlands spent about 1.5 percent of its GDP in 2009 on defense.


Although it is divesting itself of F-16s, the Netherlands still plans on purchasing Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighters once they are in production.


Meanwhile, Britain's Ministry of Defense -- also struggling with ways to save pounds and pence -- said it wrote off more than $180 million last year, including about $16.7 million notated as "fruitless payments."


The 2010-2011 write-offs include a nearly $2.8 million out-of-court settlement with a furniture company at the end of a contract. A crash involving a warhead at the U.S. Naval Air Warfare Center in China Lake, Calif., cost more than $1.6 million.


The gifting of fiberglass helmets and body armor to the Ugandan government carried a price tag of nearly $2.8 million.


Just over $93 million was written off as "constructive losses" -- mainly canceled projects.


"As we acknowledged in our response to the NAO's (National Audit Office) report in June, the Ministry of Defense has not managed its resources well for many years," a ministry spokeswoman said. "That said, the NAO has now rightly acknowledged that improvements have been made to the MOD's inventory processes.


"We take the issue of write-offs seriously and while it is not possible to plan for every eventuality, a full investigation is carried out whenever write-off action is taken to ensure relevant lessons are identified and learned."

www.upi.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistani JF-17 A Thunder OR A Blunder

Pakistan has witnessed new defense acquisitions in this decade than any other, and in the center of it all is the new fighter which was designed by China with partial funding from Pakistan. It is formally known as JF-17 Thunder. When the fighter was in development, Pakistani online communities were jumping with excitement comparing it with its arch rival India’s modern combatants Su-30MKI, Mig-29S & Mirage-2000H. There were claims of it featuring western Radars and long range missiles, & Chinese ordering some due to its superior capabilities. But the reality is far from it. China having spent significant amount of money into a fighter which it is never going to use, most probably forced Pakistan to accept its avionics to offset some its development costs. Chinese who are known for their self reliance first and quality next, are further downgrading JF-17s capabilities with their poorly copy-pirated avionics. Along with their dubious weapons, any chance of JF

Pakistani F-16s Shoot Down RAF Eurofighter Typhoons During Air Combat Exercises In Turkey

Pakistani pilots flying modernised versions of the 1970s-vintage F-16 Falcon fighter have beaten the RAF's brand-new Eurofighter Typhoon superfighters during air combat exercises in Turkey, according to a Pakistani officer. Analysis: The RAF Typhoon, formerly known as the Eurofighter, should nonetheless have been vastly superior in air-to-air combat whether BVR or close in within visual range (WVR). The cripplingly expensive, long-delayed Eurofighter was specifically designed to address the defects of its predecessor the Tornado F3 – famously almost useless in close-in, dogfighting-style air combat. The Typhoon was meant to see off such deadly in-close threats as Soviet "Fulcrums" and "Flankers" using short-range missiles fired using helmet-mounted sight systems: such planes were thought well able to beat not just Tornados but F-16s in close fighting, and this expectation was borne out after the Cold War when the Luftwaffe inherite

India Planned Attack On Pak Navy Mehran Base To Kill Chinese Engineers

The terrorist attack on Karachi's Mehran Naval Station on May 22 was conceived and launched by India with the primary objective of killing the Chinese engineers present there, a Pakistani newspaper has claimed, citing 'informed sources'. Four to six Taliban terrorists had entered PNS Mehran on May 22, destroying two maritime surveillance aircraft and killing ten military personnel during their 17-hour siege of the naval air base. "India is the only country in the region that feels troubled by the Pakistan Navy, which had awfully beaten the Indian Navy in Operation Dwarka of 1965. Since then, it has been an earnest desire of India to harm the Pakistan Navy but it was perhaps not possible on the battle front, hence it struck the PNS Mehran," The News quoted sources as saying.